From today's Boston Globe: The U.S. Joint Forces Command, in charge of forecasting how the world will look in 25 years and what kinds of wars will need to be fought over what sorts of conflicts, has issued its report.
The report says, "In many respects, scientific conclusions about the causes and potential effects of global warming are contradictory."
The scientific community responds, "What the hell are you talking about?"
MIT professor Kerry Emmanuel says, "I don't know where that statement came from, but it's pretty bizarre."
Hmm. What could possibly be the sources of blatant, harmful misinformation that ignores science in order to promote personal agendas and protect corporate interests?
.
Posts
1 comment:
Christ, we've still got another month of these 2 assholes. And can someone explain to me the history of the presidential pardon? I didn't know the president was royalty who could magically pardon someone's crime with a waive of his scepter. Seems to run contrary to everything America's supposed to be about. Yet it seems to be accepted nationwide w/out much fuss, even when presidents act against the interest of the general public.
Post a Comment